Delaware.gov logo

Authenticated PDF Version

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES

Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance

Statutory Authority: 31 Delaware Code, Section 512 (31 Del.C. §512)

PROPOSED

PUBLIC NOTICE

Medicaid Reimbursement for Prescription Drugs

In compliance with the State's Administrative Procedures Act (APA - Title 29, Chapter 101 of the Delaware Code) and under the authority of Title 31 of the Delaware Code, Chapter 5, Section 512 and with 42 CFR §447.205, Delaware Health and Social Services (DHSS) / Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance (DMMA) is proposing to amend the Title XIX Medicaid State Plan regarding the drug pricing reimbursement methodology for pharmaceutical products, specifically, implementation of the pricing benchmark, National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC), as published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Any person who wishes to make written suggestions, compilations of data, testimony, briefs or other written materials concerning the proposed new regulations must submit same to Sharon L. Summers, Planning & Policy Development Unit, Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance, 1901 North DuPont Highway, P.O. Box 906, New Castle, Delaware 19720-0906 or by fax to 302-255-4425 by March 31, 2014.

The action concerning the determination of whether to adopt the proposed regulation will be based upon the results of Department and Division staff analysis and the consideration of the comments and written materials filed by other interested persons.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL

The Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance (DMMA) hereby affords the public notice of its intention to amend the Title XIX Medicaid State Plan regarding the drug pricing reimbursement methodology for pharmaceutical products, specifically, implementation of the pricing benchmark, National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC).

Statutory Authority

1902(a)(19) of the Social Security Act, Care and services under a Medicaid state plan be provided in a manner consistent with simplicity of administration and the best interests of beneficiaries
1927 of the Social Security Act, Payment for Covered Outpatient Drugs
42 CFR §440.120, Prescribed drugs
42 CFR §447.201, State plan requirements
42 CFR §447.205, Public notice of changes in Statewide methods and standards for setting payment rates

Background

Section 1927(f) of the Social Security Act provides, in part, that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) may contract with a vendor to conduct monthly surveys with respect to prices for covered outpatient drugs dispensed by retail community pharmacies. In addition, section 1927(i) also provides in part that CMS complete an annual report to Congress that includes ingredient costs paid for single source, multiple source, and non-prescription covered outpatient drugs.

Monthly surveys focus on the drug prices that retail community pharmacies pay to acquire drugs. Specifically, the vendor surveys these acquisition costs of covered outpatient drugs purchased by independent and chain retail community pharmacies.

State Medicaid agencies reimburse participating pharmacy providers for covered outpatient drugs that are prescribed and dispensed to Medicaid beneficiaries. The payment consists of two parts: 1) reimbursement for drug ingredient costs, and 2) reimbursement for the cost of dispensing. In general, federal regulations require that Medicaid programs reimburse for drug ingredient costs at no more than the agency’s best estimate of the acquisition cost for a drug. As defined in federal regulations at §42 CFR 447.502, estimated acquisition cost (EAC) is the state’s best estimate of the prices generally and currently paid by providers for a drug marketed or sold by manufacturers or labelers in the package size of the drug most frequently purchased by providers.

Many Medicaid agencies currently utilize published drug pricing benchmarks to determine the EAC for drug ingredient costs.The Average Wholesale Price (AWP) was a primary drug pricing benchmark utilized in pharmaceutical reimbursement by state Medicaid agencies. Through numerous investigations, the Office of Inspector General found that AWP-based reimbursement was “fundamentally flawed” and caused Medicaid to pay too much for certain drugs.

In late 2009, a working group within the National Association of State Medicaid Directors (NASMD) convened to discuss various alternatives to AWP. The working group authored a white paper in June 2010 entitled “Post AWP Pricing and Reimbursement” that evaluated and developed options for the replacement of AWP in Medicaid reimbursement methodologies. Among the recommendations presented in the white paper was the establishment of a single national pricing benchmark based on average drug acquisition costs. Such a benchmark would provide state Medicaid agencies with a better estimate of prices paid by pharmacies for drugs because it would be based upon actual drug purchases. This approach to drug ingredient price determination provides greater accuracy and transparency in how drug prices are established and is generally more resistant to manipulation. The NASMD requested that CMS coordinate, develop, and support this benchmark.

CMS contracted with Myers and Stauffer LC, a national certified public accounting firm, to conduct surveys of retail community pharmacy prices, including drug ingredient costs, and to develop the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) pricing benchmark.

Purpose of NADAC

The purpose of the NADAC is to create a new national price benchmark that is more reflective of the prices that pharmacies pay to acquire prescription and over-the-counter drugs. The statute provides that such prices represent a nationwide average of consumer purchase prices, net of discounts and rebates. The survey data will provide information which CMS expects to use to assure compliance with Federal requirements. A monthly nationwide survey of licensed retail community pharmacies, which will include independent pharmacies and chain pharmacies in the United States, will be performed to collect drug acquisition cost information. To ensure that NADACs are accurate, timely, and robust, the NADACs will be reviewed and updated on a weekly basis.

The NADAC is available for consideration by the States to assist with their individual pharmacy reimbursement policies. CMS has contracted with Myers and Stauffer LC, a national certified public accounting firm, to conduct the surveys of drug ingredient costs from pharmacy entities, such as independent pharmacies and chain pharmacies in the United States, and to develop and maintain the NADAC pricing benchmark.

States have the option to use the NADAC as a reference price when setting their reimbursement methodology. To do so, states must submit a State Plan Amendment (SPA) to CMS in accordance with state plan requirements if they decide to use NADAC as a basis for payment.

Summary of Proposal

Delaware Health and Social Services (DHSS)/Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance (DMMA) is implementing a new drug pricing methodology to reimburse pharmacies that dispense pharmaceutical products to Medicaid recipients. Effective April 1, 2014, DHSS/DMMA will start reimbursing pharmacies using the average acquisition cost (ACC) of a given pharmaceutical product using National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) files that gives state Medicaid agencies covered outpatient drug information regarding retail prices for prescription drugs. The NADAC, as published by CMS, is a more accurate reflection of the ingredient cost of the medications covered by the DMMA drug benefit program.

Instead of the Average Wholesale Price (AWP), DMMA will reimburse pharmacy providers based on the NADAC for the ingredient cost and a dispensing fee more in line with the true cost of dispensing. The change will also reflect a more accurate definition of “Usual & Customary” for these providers.

Professional Dispensing Fee

Currently, the dispensing fee is set at three dollars and sixty-five cents ($3.65). DMMA will also revise its dispensing fee from $3.65 to ten dollars ($10.00) for each prescription.

In a proposed rule published in the Federal Register on February 2, 2012 regarding covered outpatient drugs at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-02-02/pdf/2012-2014.pdf, CMS proposes to replace the term “dispensing fee” with “professional dispensing fee”. In the proposed rule, CMS retains the current definition of “dispensing fee,” but proposes to replace the term with “professional dispensing fee” to reinforce the agency’s position that once the reimbursement for a drug is properly determined, the dispensing fee should reflect the pharmacist’s professional services and costs.  DMMA agrees and has replaced the term “dispensing fee” with “professional dispensing fee”.

The provisions of this state plan amendment are subject to approval by CMS.

Fiscal Impact Statement

It is estimated that the fiscal impact will result in savings in state and federal expenditures as follows:

 
Federal Fiscal Year 2014
Federal Fiscal Year 2015
General (State) Funds
$604,000.00
$1,340,000.00
Federal Funds
$747,000.00
$1,660,000.00

DMMA PROPOSED REGULATION #14-06

REVISIONS:

ATTACHMENT 4.19-B

Page 14

STATE PLAN UNDER TITLE XIX OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT

STATE: Delaware

METHODS AND STANDARDS FOR ESTABLISHING PAYMENT RATES – OTHER TYPES OF CARE

REIMBURSEMENT FOR PHARMACEUTICALS

Overview

The Delaware Medical Assistance Program (DMAP) will reimburse pharmaceuticals using the lower of:

The usual and customary (U & C) charge to the general public for the product,
The Estimated Acquisition Cost (EAC) which is defined for both brand name and generic drugs as follows:
For Traditional Pharmacies: AWP minus 16% plus dispensing fee per prescription, effective for dates of service on or after April 1, 2009
For Non-Traditional Pharmacies: AWP minus 16% plus dispensing fee per prescription, effective for dates of service on or after April 1, 2009
The National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) or if a NADAC is not available the Average Wholesale Price (AWP) minus 19%,
A State-specific maximum allowable cost (DMAC) and, in some cases, the Federally defined Federal Upper Limit (FUL) prices plus a dispensing fee, when the purchase price is not appropriately represented by either the NADAC nor 81% of the AWP,
The Federal Upper Limit (FUL) will not be used since it would be in conflict with the NADAC which is updated more frequently.

Entities that qualify for special purchasing under Section 602 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992, Public Health Service covered entities, selected disproportionate share hospitals and entities exempt from the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act of 1936 must charge the DMAP no more than an estimated acquisition cost (EAC) their actual acquisition cost (AAC) plus a professional dispensing fee. The EAC AAC must be supported by invoice and payment documentation.

Professional Dispensing Fee:

The professional dispensing fee rate is $3.65 $10.00. There is one professional dispensing fee per 30-day period unless the class of drugs is routinely prescribed for a limited number of days.

Definitions:

Delaware Maximum Allowable Cost (DMAC) - a maximum price set for reimbursement:

for generics available from three (3) or more approved sources, or
when a single source product has Average Selling Prices provided by the manufacturer that indicates the AWP is exaggerated, or
when the NADAC does not reflect the most current cost of a multiple source drug, or
if a single provider agrees to a special price.

Usual and Customary (U & C) - the lower of

amount charged to a cash paying customer
amount charged to customers enrolled in the provider’s discount program
contracted rates with Delaware State employee groups
contracted rates for any Federal employee groups.

Any willing provider can dispense the product.

17 DE Reg. 893 (03/01/14) (Prop.)
 
+