DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of the Secretary

Statutory Authority: 14 Delaware Code, Section 122(b) (14 Del.C. §122(b))

14 DE Admin. Code 264

PROPOSED

PUBLIC NOTICE

Education Impact Analysis Pursuant To 14 Del.C. Section 122(d)

264 General Administrative Appeal Procedures for the Summer Food Service Programs of the United States Department of Agriculture CACFP/USDA

A. Type of Regulatory Action Required

Repealing of Existing Regulation

B. Synopsis of Subject Matter of the Regulation

The Secretary of Education intends to repeal 14 DE Admin. Code 264 General Administrative Appeal Procedures for the Summer Food Service Program of the United States Department of Agriculture CACFP/USDA. This regulation is being repealed as it is outdated and determined to be no longer needed. Districts and charter schools participating in these child nutrition programs are required to follow federal law governing these programs (known as Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, 42 U.S.C. § 1751, et seq.). This federal law creates a high standard for program requirements that exceed the current regulation.

Persons wishing to present their views regarding this matter may do so in writing by the close of business on or before January 7, 2017 to Tina Shockley, Education Associate, Department of Education, Regulatory Review, at 401 Federal Street, Suite 2, Dover, Delaware 19901. A copy of this regulation may be viewed online at the Registrar of Regulation’s website, http://regulations.delaware.gov/services/current_issue.shtml, or obtained at the Department of Education, Finance Office, located at the address listed above.

C. Impact Criteria

1. Will the amended regulation help improve student achievement as measured against state achievement standards? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the requirements within the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

2. Will the amended regulation help ensure that all students receive an equitable education? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

3. Will the amended regulation help to ensure that all students’ health and safety are adequately protected? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

4. Will the amended regulation help to ensure that all students’ legal rights are respected? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

5. Will the amended regulation preserve the necessary authority and flexibility of decision making at the local board and school level? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

6. Will the amended regulation place unnecessary reporting or administrative requirements or mandates upon decision makers at the local board and school levels? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

7. Will the decision making authority and accountability for addressing the subject to be regulated be placed in the same entity? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

8. Will the amended regulation be consistent with and not an impediment to the implementation of other state educational policies, in particular to state educational policies addressing achievement in the core academic subjects of mathematics, science, language arts and social studies? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

9. Is there a less burdensome method for addressing the purpose of the regulation? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

10. What is the cost to the State and to the local school boards of compliance with the regulation? This regulation is being repealed as districts and charter schools currently abide by the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.

264 General Administrative Appeal Procedures for the Summer Food Service Programs of the United States Department of Agriculture CACFP/USDA

1.0 Institutions Participating in the Delaware SFSP May Request an Administrative Appeal of the Following Actions

1.1 Denial of a new or renewing institution's application for participation;

1.2 Denial of a sponsor’s request for an advance payment;

1.3 Denial of all or a part of a sponsor’s claim for reimbursement (except for a denial based on a late submission under 7 CFR §225.9(d)(5);

1.4 Refusal to forward to FNS an exception request by the sponsor for payment of a late claim or request for an upward adjustment to a claim;

1.5 A claim against a sponsor for remittance of a payment;

1.6 Termination of the sponsor or site; and,

1.7 Denial of a sponsor’s application for a site;

2.0 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Section 1.0 Above, Institutions Participating in the Delaware SFSP May Not Request an Administrative Review of Decisions Made by FNS with Respect to Late Claims or Upward Adjustments Under S 225.9(d)(5).

3.0 Administrative Appeal Procedures Shall Apply as Set Forth Below

3.1 The Department of Education (“Department”) shall give written notice of the action being taken or proposed, the grounds upon which the action is based, and the procedures under which the sponsor or food service management company may request an appeal of the action. Notice shall be given to the institution’s executive director or other responsible individuals by certified mail, return receipt requested. As used herein, “Petitioner” means a participating institution or agency, or its responsible individuals, as appropriate under the circumstances.

3.2 A request for administrative appeal shall be submitted to the Department in writing not later than 15 days after the date the notice of action is received and the appeal shall meet the requirements specified in 3.5 below.

3.3 The petitioner shall make an appeal within ten (10) working days from the date on which the notice of action is received.

3.4 Any information on which the Department’s action was based shall be available to the petitioner for inspection from the date of receipt by the Department of the request for an administrative appeal.

3.5 The petitioner may refute the findings contained in the notice of action in person or by submitting written documentation to the Department’s review official. In order to be considered, written documentation shall be submitted to the review official not later than seven (7) days after the petitioner submitted the appeal, must clearly identify the Department action being appealed, and must include a photocopy of the notice of action issued by the Department.

3.6 A hearing shall be held by the administrative appeal official in addition to, or in lieu of, a review of written information only if the petitioner requests a hearing in the written request for an administrative appeal. If the petitioner fails to appear at a scheduled hearing, the petitioner waives the right to a personal appearance before the administrative appeal official, unless the administrative appeal official agrees to reschedule the hearing. A representative of the Department may, but is not required, to attend the hearing to respond to the petitioner’s testimony and written information and to answer questions posed by the administrative appeal official. If a hearing is requested, the petitioner and the Department must be provided with at least 10 days written notice, sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, of the time and place of the hearing.

3.7 The petitioner may retain legal counsel or may be represented by another person if permitted by law.

3.8 The hearing shall be held within fourteen (14) days of the date of the receipt of the request for review, but, where applicable, not before the appellant’s written documentation is received in accordance with paragraphs 3.4 to 3.7.

3.9 The administrative appeal official shall be independent and impartial. The administrative appeal official may be an employee of the Department, but shall not have been involved in the action that is the subject of the administrative review, or have a direct personal or financial interest in the outcome of the administrative review. The petitioner may contact the administrative appeal official directly, but all such contacts shall include the participation of a representative of the Department, if the Department chooses to participate.

3.10 The administrative appeal official shall make a determination based solely on the information provided by the Department, the petitioner, and based upon Program regulations, policies and procedures governing the SFSP.

3.11 The decision of the administrative appeal official shall be issued to the Department and petitioner within five (5) days of the petitioner’s hearing, or within five (5) working days after receipt of the written documentation if no hearing is held, the appeal official shall make a determination based upon a full review of the administrative record and inform the petitioner of the determination of the review by certified mail, return receipt requested. If the last day on which the decision is to be issued shall fall on a Saturday, Sunday, legal state holiday, or day when the Department is closed due to adverse weather conditions, the decision shall be issued on the next regular work day of the Department. The failure to issue a timely decision shall not, constitute grounds for reversing the Department’s action. The decision of the administrative appeal official is the final administrative determination to be afforded to the petitioner.

3.12 The Department’s action shall remain in effect during the appeal process. However, participating sponsors and sites may continue to operate the Program during an appeal of termination, and if the appeal results in overturning the Department’s decision, reimbursement shall be paid for meals during the appeal process. However, such continued Program operation shall not be allowed if the Department’s action is based on imminent dangers to the health or welfare of children. If the sponsor or site has been terminated for this reason, the Department shall so specify in its notice of action.

3.13 The Department shall send written notification of the complete appeal procedures and of the actions which can be appealed, as specified in sections 1.1 to 1.7, to each potential sponsor applying to participate and to each food service management company applying to register in accordance with 7 CFR 225.6(g).

3.14 The Department shall maintain a searchable record of all administrative reviews and the dispositions of the same. The record shall document the Department’s compliance with these regulations and shall include the basis for its decision.

(11/15/16) *Note: Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, 42 U.S.C. § 1751, et. seq. governs these programs.

8 DE Reg. 1473 (04/01/05)

13 DE Reg. 1298 (04/01/10)

20 DE Reg. 402 (12/01/16) (Prop.)